段落推理題是考研閱讀理解常用的一種命題方式。這類題目往往選取文章中的某段或是某個(gè)句子，或是某人的言論讓考生推斷隱含的意思。有的考生對(duì)這種題目很是頭疼。覺得無從下手：文章還是半懂不懂的，更別說探究隱含

　　其實(shí)，不盡然。段落推理題的題目很容易識(shí)別，常用的命題形式有：What can we infer from the first paragraph? (從第一段中我們能推出什么?)首先明確考研中根本就沒有所謂的推理，推理題的做法和細(xì)節(jié)題的做法是一致的，只是這樣設(shè)置題干可以擴(kuò)大命題控制的區(qū)域，一個(gè)題目在某些情況下甚至相當(dāng)于四個(gè)細(xì)節(jié)題，早年還有更為無恥的命題方式：What can be inferred from the passage? 這樣命題其實(shí)就是出題人希望試題涵蓋更多的測(cè)試點(diǎn)，對(duì)考生來講最大的障礙就是time-consuming(耗時(shí))，考生如果每個(gè)選項(xiàng)仔細(xì)和原文比對(duì)應(yīng)該不難找出答案，哪怕費(fèi)時(shí)稍微多一些。但是有的時(shí)候我們卻遇到出題人為我們?cè)O(shè)置的另外一個(gè)困境：選項(xiàng)和原文比對(duì)時(shí)，我們很難排除。先看一個(gè)例題：

　　2007年Text 4最后一題：

　　It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that___________.

　　[A] data leakage is more severe in Europe

　　[B] FTC’s decision is essential to data security

　　[C] California takes the lead in security legislation

　　[D] legal penalty is a major solution to data leakage

　　原文根據(jù)：

　　1.The current state of affaires may have been encouraged—though not justified—by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe) for data leakage.

　　2.Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray.

　　3. That may change fast: lots of proposed data-security legislation is now doing the rounds in Washington, D.C.

　　4.Meanwhile, the theft of information about some 40 million credit-card accounts in America, disclosed on June 17th, overshadowed a hugely important decision a day earlier by America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that puts corporate America on notice that regulators will act if firms fail to provide adequate data security.

　　參考譯文：

　　1.盡管還沒有得到證實(shí)，但目前這類事件的發(fā)生很有可能是因?yàn)檫�沒有相關(guān)法律對(duì)信息泄漏做出處罰(在美國(guó)，不是在歐洲)。

　　2.直到最近，加利福尼亞才通過了一項(xiàng)法律，而在此之前，當(dāng)信息被竊取時(shí)，美國(guó)的公司不用告知任何人，甚至包括受害人，信息是何時(shí)泄露的。

　　3.這種情況可能迅速改變：如今，許多信息保護(hù)法的議案正在華盛頓被廣泛傳議。

　　4.與此同時(shí)，6月17日披露的消息表明，美國(guó)大約4000萬張信用卡的信息被人****，這一情況給美國(guó)聯(lián)邦貿(mào)易委員會(huì)在前一天所作的一個(gè)重要決定蒙上了陰影，該決定要求美國(guó)所有的商業(yè)公司提供充足的數(shù)據(jù)安全保障，否則監(jiān)管人員就會(huì)采取行動(dòng)。

　　通過第一句括號(hào)中的內(nèi)容可以排除[A] data leakage is more severe in Europe。

　　通過第四句我們找到了[B] FTC’s decision is essential to data security的依據(jù)。

　　通過第二句我們又看到了[C] California takes the lead in security legislation的依據(jù)。

　　通過第一句我們也看到了[D] legal penalty is a major solution to data leakage的依據(jù)。

　　在考場(chǎng)上很少同學(xué)能篤定地選擇出一個(gè)選項(xiàng)，而在一些輔導(dǎo)書的講解中，也是非常牽強(qiáng)的給出了一些排除B、C選項(xiàng)理由：比如說：C選項(xiàng)中的加州只是走到了美國(guó)的前列。(但是在很多時(shí)候這樣的表達(dá)在其他題目中又是正確的，且本來這篇文章主要就是在說美國(guó)的數(shù)據(jù)泄露問題，筆者不認(rèn)為這樣的表述有問題)，B選項(xiàng)中的決定只是重要而已而不是essential (這就更是不懂出題人的又一佐證了，essential和important在很多時(shí)候都是可以替換的)。

　　這就是考研出題人為了體現(xiàn)考研選拔性考試特征而動(dòng)用的潛規(guī)則了：主題為王，結(jié)論為王;在文中第一句是論點(diǎn)和結(jié)論，而二、三、四句都是論據(jù)， 之所以選擇D是源自結(jié)論而由于B和C是源自論據(jù)，出生和血統(tǒng)就不一樣，一切的掙扎都是徒勞。答案只能是D。

　　這樣的題目在段落推理中很是常見，再如：

　　47. What can we infer from the first three paragraphs?

　　[A] In both East and West, names are essential to success.

　　[B] The alphabet is to blame for the failure of Zoë Zysman.

　　[C] Customers often pay a lot of attention to companies' names.

　　[D] Some form of discrimination is too subtle to recognize.

　　Over the past century, all kinds of unfairness and discrimination have been condemned or made illegal. But one insidious form continues to thrive: alphabetism. This, for those as yet unaware of such a disadvantage, refers to discrimination against those whose surnames begin with a letter in the lower half of the alphabet.

　　It has long been known that a taxi firm called AAAA cars has a big advantage over Zodiac cars when customers thumb through their phone directories. Less well known is the advantage that Adam Abbott has in life over Zoë Zysman. English names are fairly evenly spread between the halves of the alphabet. Yet a suspiciously large number of top people have surnames beginning with letters between A and K.

　　Thus the American president and vice-president have surnames starting with B and C respectively; and 26 of George Bush's predecessors (including his father) had surnames in the first half of the alphabet against just 16 in the second half. Even more striking, six of the seven heads of government of the G7 rich countries are alphabetically advantaged (Berlusconi, Blair, Bush, Chirac, Chrétien and Koizumi). The world's three top central bankers (Greenspan, Duisenberg and Hayami) are all close to the top of the alphabet, even if one of them really uses Japanese characters. As are the world's five richest men (Gates, Buffett, Allen, Ellison and Albrecht).

　　這三個(gè)段落中，第一段是結(jié)論，而二三段是論據(jù)。

　　A、B、C選項(xiàng)且不去討論其表述正確與否，只需從In both East and West，Zoë Zysman，companies' names這樣的字詞中即可判定出其源自論據(jù)的出生，他們一開始就注定了不能成為正確答案的宿命，無需步步驚心。

　　段落性的推理題在按照常規(guī)的解題思路完成后，和主題相關(guān)選項(xiàng)大于和細(xì)節(jié)相關(guān)的選項(xiàng)，和結(jié)論相關(guān)的選項(xiàng)大于和論據(jù)相關(guān)的選項(xiàng)。這就是又一考研的特色。因此在解題的過程中一定要關(guān)注觀點(diǎn)和結(jié)論，和觀點(diǎn)表達(dá)相關(guān)的動(dòng)詞在必殺技一中已經(jīng)列出。

　　2006年26題

　　From the first two paragraphs, we learn that_________.

　　[A]the townsfolk deny the RSC‘s contribution to the town’s revenue

　　[B] the actors of the RSC imitate Shakespeare on and off stage

　　[C] the two branches of the RSC are not on good terms

　　[D] the townsfolk earn little from tourism

　　答案為A選項(xiàng)，解題思路就是第一段是事實(shí)的論述，而第二段第一句就出現(xiàn)了觀點(diǎn)，對(duì)應(yīng)A選項(xiàng)。

　　2008年37題

　　We may infer from the second paragraph that____________.

　　[A] DNA technology has been widely applied to history research

　　[B] in its early days the U.S. was confronted with delicate situations

　　[C] historians deliberately made up some stories of Jefferson’s life

　　[D] political compromises are easily found throughout the U.S. history

　　答案為B選項(xiàng)，正是對(duì)應(yīng)于歷史學(xué)家們著作中的結(jié)論，而其他幾個(gè)選項(xiàng)都是從論據(jù)入手的，且是錯(cuò)誤的表述。

◇注冊(cè)成為本站會(huì)員，可免費(fèi)下載更多學(xué)習(xí)資料，點(diǎn)擊注冊(cè)。
◇建議使用迅雷等同類下載工具下載本站學(xué)習(xí)資料！使用WinRAR3.51以上版本解壓本站提供的資料；
◇PDF格式文件請(qǐng)使用Adobe Acrobat Reader打開；
◇VCE格式文件請(qǐng)使用Visual CertExam Suite打開；
◇PDG格式文件請(qǐng)使用超星閱覽器打開；WDL格式文件請(qǐng)用WDL文件閱讀器打開；